Sixteen Prosecuted in Phuket Nominee Operation as Land Office Begins Forced Disposal of Foreign-Held Plots

Phuket police prosecuted 16 people in a Phase 4 nominee raid on 6 August 2026, as the Provincial Land Office begins forcibly selling land held by foreign-majority companies.
Phuket's Nominee Crackdown Reaches Its Fourth Phase, and the Land Office Starts Forcing Sales #
Key takeaways
- Eight raids, 16 prosecuted: 10 Thais, 2 Canadians, 3 Russians and 1 Kazakhstani, police said; six more under investigation.12
- 361 companies under land review: the Land Office and Thalang branch have sued 114, fined 39, and forcibly sold 15 rai and 13 square wah.1
- 149 entities face disposal next: land held where foreign shareholders exceed half the shares enters the same forced-sale process.1
- Better-than-Freehold™ takeaway: no Thai shareholder holding land for a foreigner's benefit leaves nothing on the registry to reach.
What Happened in Phuket's Phase 4 Nominee Operation? #
- What the Land Office Found
- What the New Registration Checks Now Test
- What This Means for At-Risk Property-Owning Companies
- What This Means for Buyers Weighing a Structure
- The Better-than-Freehold™ Solution
- FAQ Section
- Related Terms
- Expert Guidance
What the Land Office Found #
The land strand runs deeper than the raids. After a 25 July confrontation at Phuket's Chabad House, Deputy Interior Minister Polpee Suwanchawee widened the inspection programme: "This is Thailand. Everyone on Thai soil must comply with Thai law."3
That is now the Phuket Provincial Land Office and Thalang branch examining 361 companies for land held through foreign-majority shareholding: 114 sued, 39 fined, and 15 rai and 13 square wah of land sold, roughly 24,050 square metres.1
A further 149 entities own land with over half foreign shareholding; disposal is under way there too. Phase 4 identified eight suspected nominee companies, taking such prosecuted cases to 31.1
What the New Registration Checks Now Test #
New checks apply to any company with foreign investment, testing capital at formation, not years later at a raid.1 Registrars examine three months of bank statements against declared share values, verify the source of funds, and confirm business premises.
Accountants and lawyers fall inside the perimeter too, verifying a company's identity through the registration system before filing.
A source-of-funds record is harder to coach than a witness. It sits with the Department of Business Development and Ministry of Commerce before a share transfers: new foreign-invested registrations fell 57.64%, liquidations rose 20.65%, a market signal too.1
What This Means for At-Risk Property-Owning Companies #
An owner whose company holds land for a foreigner's benefit should watch the land strand: it started from registry records, not a tip at the door.
No warrant required. A mismatch between declared shareholding and who controls the land is enough. Enforcement pairs forced disposal by the Land Department with dissolution by the courts, and both are moving here. A planned divestment, eight to sixteen weeks and expected to shorten to under four as Better-than-Freehold™ grows, keeps that decision with the owner.
What This Means for Buyers Weighing a Structure #
A Thai company is no shortcut anymore. The new checks, not a broker's promise, are the real test: bank statements and a source-of-funds review, now required before any land registers.
A compliant long-lease structure is judged on its own documents. A foreign-majority company dressed as Thai-owned is judged against bank records instead: the Foreign Business Act still reaches it, up to three years and THB 100,000 to 1,000,000 under s.37, plus dissolution.
The Better-than-Freehold™ Solution #
Compliance comes first. Thailand Investor Network, a 100% Thai-owned property holding and management company with no foreign funding or control, holds legal title.
Security follows. SPH Trustees, a Labuan FSA-regulated trust company, holds the lease and option through a bare trust; four registered instruments, enforced by Clear Blue Security Agents (CBSA) without court dependency.
Benefits complete the picture: financing to 50% LTV (expected Q1 2027), resale by assignment of trust interest, and succession without Thai probate.
Free to start · No obligation · Your decision at every stage
FAQ Section #
Related Terms #
- Nominee Company Risks in Thailand - the pattern behind both the raids and the land-office cases
- Foreign Business Act Thailand - the statute behind the s.37 exposure
- Gatekeeper Liability in Thailand - what the new verification duty asks of advisers
- Thailand Property Market Analysis - the incorporation drop as a market signal
Expert Guidance #
Immediate Action Required #
Owners should assume registry data alone can trigger this, not just conduct. It has already produced 114 lawsuits and 39 fines in Phuket. Contact the Better-than-Freehold™ advisory team for a confidential compliance assessment.
Long-term Security Strategy #
A planned divestment puts the exit on the owner's own timetable, not a Land Office's.
Free to start · No obligation · Your decision at every stage
Conclusion #
The land-disposal figures outrank the arrest count. Sixteen prosecutions make headlines; 149 entities entering disposal shows the chain completing end to end. None of the sixteen has been convicted. A Thai shareholder holding land for a foreigner's benefit now faces two routes to loss: prosecution, or a land registry that disposes of the property whatever a court decides.
References #
This article is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal, tax, or investment advice. Laws and enforcement practices change; obtain advice tailored to your situation before acting.
Footnotes #
-
The Phuket News. (2026, August 10). "16 prosecuted in latest Phuket nominee raids." https://www.thephuketnews.com/ ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8
-
Wochenblitz. (2026, August). "Phuket: 16 Strohmänner identifiziert und 361 Firmen im Visier." https://www.wochenblitz.com/phuket-fasst-16-strohmaenner-prueft-361-firmen/ ↩
-
Nation Thailand. (2026, July 26). "Phuket nominee crackdown widens after Chabad House confrontation." https://www.nationthailand.com/news/general/40069062 ↩
About the Author: Andrew Moore FPFS, CDir
Chairman, Better than Freehold

Andrew Moore has been an active investor in Thai property since 2004. He is a Chartered Director and a Fellow of the Personal Finance Society. He has invested in and built properties in several countries since the late 90's and first invested in Thailand 20 years ago. Having owned residencies in Bangkok, Samui, Phangan and Phuket he can offer a unique perspective on the island's property markets together with past and future trends in both ownership and investor opportunities.
