The Justice Minister Has Given the Phuket MP a Final Date of 28 September and Said an Arrest Warrant Could Follow If He Misses It

Justice Minister Rutthaphon Naowarat has set 28 September as a final summons date for Phuket MP Somchart Techathavorncharoen and confirmed, when asked, that an arrest warrant could follow. He remains a witness, charged with nothing.
The Minister Sets a Final Summons and Confirms Arrest Could Follow #
Key takeaways
- A date, finally: 28 September, called final and set at his own request.1
- Arrest, confirmed on questioning: a warrant could follow non-appearance, the Minister said.12
- Witness status unchanged: no charge exists against him or anyone else.13
- Better-than-Freehold™ takeaway: no Thai shareholder means no name for screening to summon.
What Did the Minister Say? #
- The Mechanism the Minister Described
- How Many Summonses Is This?
- What This Means for Owners
- The Better-than-Freehold™ Solution
- FAQ Section
- Related Terms
- Expert Guidance
The Mechanism the Minister Described #
Section 24 is a powers provision, not an arrest power itself. It lets an official summon any person, witness or accused.4 Section 41 makes refusal an offence punishable by up to one year of imprisonment, a fine of up to THB 20,000, or both.4 Arrest after two ignored summonses is a Criminal Procedure Code rule, not this Act's; the Minister's route reads as a section 41 complaint.
How Many Summonses Is This? #
The Minister called this the third summons, discounting one never delivered.1 Our own tally already reached three; both counts are consistent, they simply measure differently.5 He denies any nominee role, saying not a fraction of a square millimetre of Thai land passed into foreign hands through his businesses.2 He remains a witness.
What This Means for Owners #
Compulsion is the story, not the MP. Someone accused of nothing can still be made to attend and answer, and refusing is itself an offence. That matters inside a high-risk property-owning company, where the question asked is the one that usually breaks a nominee structure: who provided the money. An orderly divestment runs eight to sixteen weeks. A compliant structure under the Foreign Business Act answers that question first, and the DBD screen does not wait.
The Better-than-Freehold™ Solution #
Compliance comes first. Thailand Investor Network, a 100% Thai-owned property holding and management company, holds legal title under a registered lease; no Thai shareholder sits between investor and land.
Security follows. SPH Trustees Ltd, a Labuan-regulated trustee, holds the lease, mortgage and Option Agreement, enforced by Clear Blue Security Agents without court dependency.
Benefits follow: ownership rights, not a shareholding to defend, financing to 50% LTV (expected H1 2027), and succession without Thai probate.
Free to start · No obligation · Your decision at every stage
FAQ Section #
Related Terms #
- Nominee Company Risks in Thailand - what this screening targets
- The Earlier Timeline on This Case - the report this updates
- Foreign Business Act Thailand - the penalty framework
- Gatekeeper Liability in Thailand - the law office link
Expert Guidance #
Immediate Action Required #
Nothing here is proved. A witness can still be compelled. Contact the Better-than-Freehold™ advisory team for a confidential compliance assessment.
Long-term Security Strategy #
No Thai name between investor and land removes the question a summons exists to ask.
Free to start · No obligation · Your decision at every stage
Conclusion #
Somchart remains a witness, charged with nothing. What changed on 21 September is that a date now exists, and missing it carries consequences even for someone accused of no offence. Investigation-stage runway is long, but it ends on a day somebody else chooses.
References #
This article is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal, tax, or investment advice. Laws and enforcement practices change; obtain advice tailored to your situation before acting.
Footnotes #
-
The Standard. (2026, September 21). Doorstep report on the final summons. https://thestandard.co/rutthapol-dsi-phuket-nominee-forex/ ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5
-
The Thaiger. (2026, September 21). "Phuket MP faces possible arrest warrant." https://thethaiger.com/news/phuket/phuket-mp-faces-possible-arrest-warrant-if-he-misses-dsi-nominee-summons ↩ ↩2 ↩3
-
MGR Online. (2026, September 14). DSI: witness, not accused. https://mgronline.com/crime/detail/9690000089752 ↩
-
Special Case Investigation Act B.E. 2547, ss. 24, 41. https://www.dsi.go.th/Upload/1138aa4c1a00b5bb18c5beb6a9ce1d0d.pdf ↩ ↩2
-
Daily News. (2026, September 21). Corroborating report. https://www.dailynews.co.th/news/6207790/ ↩
About the Author: Andrew Moore FPFS, CDir
Chairman, Better-than-Freehold™
Andrew Moore has been an active investor in Thai property since 2004. He is a Chartered Director and a Fellow of the Personal Finance Society. He has invested in and built properties in several countries since the late 1990s and first invested in Thailand in 2004. Having owned homes in Bangkok, Samui, Phangan and Phuket he can offer a unique perspective on Thailand's property markets together with past and future trends in both ownership and investor opportunities.

