The Interior Ministry Says More Than 11,000 Suspected Nominee Companies Will Be Investigated by the End of September, and the Land at Stake Has Been Revalued at THB 85 Billion

Thailand's Deputy Interior Minister says more than 11,000 companies suspected of using nominee structures face a September deadline, and the land held by 2,200 of them is now valued at roughly THB 85 billion.
Thailand Sets an End-of-September Deadline as the Nominee Land Estimate Jumps to THB 85 Billion #
Key takeaways
- Scale: more than 11,000 suspected nominee companies, closing by end September 2026.1
- Revised estimate: land held by the 2,200 land-holding companies is now put at THB 85 billion, up from THB 65 billion two weeks earlier.1
- Assets in motion: some suspected companies have already begun transferring assets.1
- Better-than-Freehold™ takeaway: a compliant structure never depends on a Thai nominee, so this screening does not reach it.
What Did the Deputy Interior Minister Announce on 15 September? #
- Where Does the THB 85 Billion Figure Come From?
- How Much Time Does a Compliant Exit Need?
- Does This Mean Foreign Owners Face Deportation?
- Which Agencies Are Involved, and What Happens Next?
- What This Means for Owners and Buyers
- The Better-than-Freehold™ Solution
- FAQ Section
- Related Terms
- Expert Guidance
Where Does the THB 85 Billion Figure Come From? #
The figure covers one subset of the probe. About 2,200 of the 11,000-plus companies hold land with more foreign than Thai shareholders, estimated at roughly THB 85 billion against THB 65 billion two weeks earlier.12 More than 1,100 were flagged separately on changed shareholder or bank details, a distinct group counted apart from the 2,200.1
How Much Time Does a Compliant Exit Need? #
A compliant exit takes eight to sixteen weeks. The ministry has given itself two weeks. Some suspected companies have already begun moving assets, the minister said.1 The safer route is a documented, orderly divestment that still stands up to examination months later.
Does This Mean Foreign Owners Face Deportation? #
No, and the minister said so directly. Land ownership offences do not automatically lead to deportation; consequence depends on legal conditions or a court ruling.1 He cited a Huai Khwang pub case: five foreigners fined, visas withdrawn, invited to leave rather than deported.1 The exposure attaches to the property first.
Which Agencies Are Involved, and What Happens Next? #
Four bodies share information: Interior, the Ministry of Commerce, the Royal Thai Police and the Department of Lands.1 Lands will accelerate its own investigations; Polapee reports to the Prime Minister.1 The same session saw the DSI accept a Pattaya nominee file as a special case.3 In that province it had already issued summonses over a 49% foreign shareholding the week before.
The Department of Business Development checks funding at filing; the Anti-Money Laundering Office can freeze assets pre-conviction. A House committee has pressed for coordinated screening separately, across eight agencies.
What This Means for Owners and Buyers #
A deadline, a revaluation upward, and a warning that assets are already moving all landed in the same week.
- Already holding land through a high-risk property-owning company: an orderly divestment from that structure runs eight to sixteen weeks, expected to reduce to under four weeks as Better-than-Freehold™ grows.
- Considering a structure before any company is formed: a registered lease and mortgage with an Option Agreement appended, held by a trust rather than a nominee.
Where an offence is confirmed, not merely screened, Foreign Business Act section 36 reaches the Thai nominee and the foreign beneficiary alike. Penalties run up to three years' imprisonment and/or a THB 100,000 to 1,000,000 fine, with daily fines of THB 10,000 to 50,000, court-ordered cessation of the shareholding, and forced disposal of the land under the Land Department.
The Better-than-Freehold™ Solution #
Compliance comes first. Thailand Investor Network, a 100% Thai-owned property holding and management company, holds legal title and grants a registered 30-year lease, leaving nothing for a shareholder screen to catch.
Security follows. SPH Trustees Ltd, a Labuan FSA-regulated trust company, holds the lease, the Option Agreement and the security position, enforced by Clear Blue Security Agents (CBSA) without court dependency. The Option is appended to the registered first-priority mortgage, not registered separately.
The structure allows resale by assignment and succession without Thai probate. Financing to 50% LTV is expected from H1 2027 and is not yet live.
Free to start · No obligation · Your decision at every stage
FAQ Section #
Related Terms #
- Nominee Company Risks in Thailand - what this screening targets
- Foreign Business Act Thailand - the statute reaching nominee and beneficiary
- Pattaya DSI Summons Over a Nominee Shareholding - the earlier case, same province
- House Committee Presses for Coordinated Nominee Screening - parliament's own push
Expert Guidance #
Immediate Action Required #
Anyone holding land through a high-risk property-owning company should begin a documented divestment now. Moving assets while under examination is the conduct the minister singled out. Contact the Better-than-Freehold™ advisory team for a confidential compliance assessment.
Long-term Security Strategy #
Stop depending on a Thai shareholder register. A registered lease, mortgage and corporate trustee put no Thai shareholder on a register at all.
Free to start · No obligation · Your decision at every stage
Conclusion #
The ministry has set its finish line at the end of September, closer than any orderly exit can run. Owners of at-risk property-owning companies should take advice and start a documented exit now rather than wait for the end-of-month figures.
References #
This article is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal, tax, or investment advice. Laws and enforcement practices change; obtain advice tailored to your situation before acting.
Footnotes #
-
Pattaya Mail / TNA. (2026, September 15). "Thailand races to probe 11,000 nominee firms tied to 85 billion baht in land." https://www.pattayamail.com/news/thailand-races-to-probe-11000-nominee-firms-tied-to-85-billion-baht-in-land-565105 ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8 ↩9 ↩10 ↩11
-
The Standard. (2026, September 15). "พลพีร์ เผยความเสียหายนอมินี-ทุนเทา พุ่ง 85,000 ล้านบาท พบต่างชาติถือครองที่ดินผิดกฎหมาย 2,200 ราย เร่งเอาผิดภายในสิ้นเดือน." https://thestandard.co/polapeer-nominee-foreigners-land-crackdown/ ↩ ↩2
-
Nation Thailand. (2026, September 15). "Thailand's DSI opens special case in Pattaya nominee crackdown." https://www.nationthailand.com/news/politics/40071062 ↩
About the Author: Andrew Moore FPFS, CDir
Chairman, Better than Freehold

Andrew Moore has been an active investor in Thai property since 2004. He is a Chartered Director and a Fellow of the Personal Finance Society. He has invested in and built properties in several countries since the late 90's and first invested in Thailand 20 years ago. Having owned residencies in Bangkok, Samui, Phangan and Phuket he can offer a unique perspective on the island's property markets together with past and future trends in both ownership and investor opportunities.
