DBD Puts 36,277 Foreign-Linked Companies Holding Land Into Its Screening Pool, and Condominium Holdings Are Next

The Department of Business Development has placed 36,277 foreign-linked companies holding Thai land titles into a screening pool, with 31,516 flagged for a funding-trail review. Inclusion is not an allegation, and condominium holdings are examined next.
The DBD Has Turned Its Whole Register Into a Nominee Screen, Not Just a Raid Target List #
Key takeaways
- Register-wide, not spot checks: 123,542 companies hold Thai land titles; 36,277 carry foreign shareholding, against 87,265 wholly Thai-owned.1
- The funding trail is the test: 31,516 companies sit at 49% or below, the group the DBD says must prove genuine Thai investment.1
- Condominiums are next: 2,120 records on company-held units follow once the Department of Lands supplies the data.12
- Better-than-Freehold™ takeaway: a national data match, not a tip-off, now decides who gets asked to explain their shareholding.
What Did the DBD Actually Disclose on 18 August? #
- How the 36,277 Companies Split by Risk
- What Happens Next With Condominiums
- The Lawful Channel Is Growing Too
- What This Means If You Hold Property Through an At-Risk Company
- The Better-than-Freehold™ Solution
- FAQ Section
- Related Terms
- Expert Guidance
How the 36,277 Companies Split by Risk #
The DBD split the 36,277 by shareholding shape. Most hold modest land. A meaningful minority holds a great deal of it.
Group A, 31,516 entities, holds foreign shareholding of no more than 49%, mostly limited companies plus 146 partnerships and 737 public limited companies.1 The DBD calls this group higher risk, because a Thai-majority shareholding on paper proves nothing about who funded it. Within it, 20,537 hold a single land title, but 3,865 hold more than ten rai each. Not just back-garden holdings.1
Group B, 4,761 entities, holds foreign shareholding above 49%, many lawful under industrial-estate or Board of Investment privileges around Chon Buri and Rayong.1 Geography matters too: 35,154 sit in sixteen provinces, Bangkok and five neighbours plus ten tourism centres including Phuket and Chiang Mai.1 Director-General Poonpong Naiyanapakorn's test was blunt: "If a venture is genuinely jointly funded by foreign and Thai investors and foreigners hold no more than 49%, it is lawful. But if the entire foreign investment comes from foreign capital and Thais do not genuinely co-invest, or if Thais hold 51% as nominees, the details must be investigated and legal action taken."1
What Happens Next With Condominiums #
After land, condominiums are the second dataset, and the concern is familiar: companies using Thai nominees to buy units beyond the foreign quota, then renting or reselling them.
The DBD is still waiting on the Department of Lands; 2,120 records are already earmarked.12 The Ministry of Commerce has given no timetable. The Condominium Act caps foreign ownership at 49% of aggregate floor area, not unit count, so a few large units absorb the quota fast.
The Lawful Channel Is Growing Too #
None of this closes the door on legitimate investment. The DBD also reported 736 foreign investors approved under the Foreign Business Act in the first seven months of 2026, up 26%, carrying THB 219.208 billion, up 37%.3 Singapore, Japan and China led the inflow. Not property money, but the point stands: the lawful route is open while disguised shareholding is under review. Our Thailand property market analysis covers where that leaves pricing.
What This Means If You Hold Property Through an At-Risk Company #
Being counted in the 36,277 is not a finding against your high-risk property-owning company. But the DBD has already matched its register once, and will do so again for condominiums. The funding trail, not the ratio on the register, is the actual test now. It does not disappear because no raid comes.
The stakes are severe, and paired. Sections 36 and 37 of the Foreign Business Act carry up to three years and a THB 100,000 to 1,000,000 fine, reaching nominee and foreign beneficiary alike, plus court dissolution.4 Land Code section 94 lets the Land Department order disposal within 180 days to one year.5 Divestment typically takes eight to sixteen weeks, a span Better-than-Freehold™ expects to cut to under four as it scales. Our guide to nominee company risks sets out where exposure sits.
The Better-than-Freehold™ Solution #
Anyone deciding how to hold property now should notice what the DBD's test rewards: structures with no Thai funding to defend. Compliance comes first. Better-than-Freehold™ holds no Thai company; nothing for a screen to flag. Security follows: a 30-year lease, an option agreement, a mortgage and a share pledge, recorded at the Land Office. Benefits complete the picture, ending at succession without Thai probate.
Free to start · No obligation · Your decision at every stage
FAQ Section #
Related Terms #
- Nominee Company Risks in Thailand - how nominee exposure arises
- Foreign Business Act Thailand - the statute behind nominee offences
- Thailand Property Market Analysis - how enforcement is shaping supply
- Anti-Money Laundering Act Thailand - the wider enforcement framework
Expert Guidance #
Immediate Action Required #
Establish, honestly, whether the Thai shareholders in your company genuinely funded their stake. Don't wait for a letter; the data match already happened once. Contact the Better-than-Freehold™ advisory team for a confidential compliance assessment.
Long-term Security Strategy #
Move toward a structure where that question never needs answering. A registered lease-based structure removes the funding trail the DBD now screens for nationwide.
Free to start · No obligation · Your decision at every stage
Conclusion #
The number that matters is not 36,277. It is 123,542, the DBD's full count of land-holding companies, matched against every foreign-linked entity at once. Enforcement that once moved island by island is now a standing national screen. Owners inside it can still choose their timing. Later, that choice may not be theirs.
References #
This article is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal, tax, or investment advice. Laws and enforcement practices change; obtain advice tailored to your situation before acting.
Footnotes #
-
Nation Thailand. (2026, August 18). "DBD scrutinises 36,277 foreign-linked landholding firms." https://www.nationthailand.com ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8 ↩9 ↩10
-
Thai Examiner (O'Connor, J.). (2026, August 18). "Expanding probe into foreign property ownership: condos in 16 provinces." https://www.thaiexaminer.com/thai-news-foreigners/2026/08/18/expanding-probe-into-foreign-property-ownership-looking-at-company-ownership-of-condos-in-16-provinces/ ↩ ↩2
-
Nation Thailand. (2026, August 18). "Foreign business approvals in Thailand rise 26% with investment up 37%." https://www.nationthailand.com/business/economy/40069947 ↩
-
Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542, sections 36 and 37, as reported alongside the DBD announcement. ↩
-
Land Code B.E. 2497, section 94, as reported alongside the DBD announcement. ↩
About the Author: Andrew Moore FPFS, CDir
Chairman, Better than Freehold

Andrew Moore has been an active investor in Thai property since 2004. He is a Chartered Director and a Fellow of the Personal Finance Society. He has invested in and built properties in several countries since the late 90's and first invested in Thailand 20 years ago. Having owned residencies in Bangkok, Samui, Phangan and Phuket he can offer a unique perspective on the island's property markets together with past and future trends in both ownership and investor opportunities.
